boonpengsaepua999: ความคาดหวังของประชาชนที่มีต่อนักการเืมืองไทยในปัจจุบัน

boonpengsaepua999: ความคาดหวังของประชาชนที่มีต่อนักการเืมืองไทยในปัจจุบัน

The concept of the establishment of democracy to economic development

       Due to Thailand's democracy is a concept that is important. And public awareness to the Democratic base. We initiated a proposal. Or national agencies to create a democracy in Thailand. And to the stability of the democratic regime of the Thai people. In this concept, would not comment on the Thai people to achieve perfection in the application.

       1. To promote democracy on the national agenda. The declared intention is to  promote national unity, reconciliation. Under the camphor in the idea of ​​democracy in the same direction. When the policy is to provide a strategy for all ministries, departments to implement.

       2. Organization in the form of democracy. Democratic development, human resources and organizations. The staff in all sectors to participate. The organization is an organization that depends on a special form of government. And the public together. The establishment of democracy to include the Ministry of Culture. And the Ministry of Human Security, together. For structure and support to the departmental level.
        2.1 Organization of civil rights or basic The agency developed the right of the people. The right to vote, the right to receive a welfare state, the right to land. And utilities, the right to receive health care, the right to make a living, right to political participation and so on.
        2.2 Organization of the liberties of the people. As development agencies take the liberty of the people. The rules, the concept of freedom, in practice, to not violate the freedom of man, how laws are against the freedom of mankind, to promote freedom of thought, writing, speaking. And the media. The Village Voice, etc. are useful to society.
        2.3 The organization promotes social equality. Of a department or agency that provides for equality in all its forms. Such as equality in education, equality in the workplace, equality in the welfare state, equality and receive benefits from natural resources. And the environment, equality of participation in any organization, whether public, private, enterprises, etc..
        2.4 Department or organization to promote brotherhood and solidarity organization that serves the unity of the knowledge I have is that the diversity. Do not mind people in the nation with disgust. Achieve unity. And social sharing or caring about each other.
        2.5 Organization of the Department or the public. Is to encourage public participation in planning conferences, design thinking to solve the problems of peace, the formation of the political government of the village, district, local, as well as a student. , a university, college, school, etc..
        2.6 Organization of a democratic culture. Of a department or agency in exchange for learning the values, tradition, tradition. 'm Fully democratic regime.  Changing concepts and knowledge to the people's democracy.
        2.7 Organization of the creation of a democratic media.  Promoting democratic media extensively.  TV for democracy in particular.  And the TV, radio, newspapers.  The process is democratic.
       3. A Democratic Congress. To collaborate, plan, design, monitor and evaluate the results. And sustain democracy by allowing people of all sectors to participate as an agent. Packaged and presented in the Parliament. Is that people want to solve the problem. Which provides a way for parliament to issue out of trouble. However, there is moderate or ranked according to the agenda. The motion presented to Parliament.
         This is just an example of a new organization. May be expanded, collapsed and, integrate  minister  and the responsibility to oversee the promotion of democracy, not a violation of human rights, freedom of the people. And increase power. (Empowerment) people are the real

To cultivate the seeds of entrepreneurship for the politcal leadership

    In the current economy. The ability of the operators is of paramount importance to the development of the nation. If the leader lacks the ability to become entrepreneurs, then. Then he can not create prosperity for the nation. The current era of globalization among countries in the world are all focused on the competition to flourish economically. The economic distribution of income to people in all strata. To the total mass of living increase (Gross National Happiness) if Thailand has a better economy. It would make the nation a better living. The ideal society would be stable. And equality. However, party leaders, political parties should be sacrificed. And representing the people of the country. And political leaders are not only good politics. But also an economic good as well. And it must be free to use the creative power. Opposition politicians are not as creative. Or build alliances with the government. Select charms and put the system without political power. The department needs the public well-being. It is imperative that political leaders should sow the idea was to help the economy grow. Not the government but the money is spent. As political leaders are often faced with the choice of public policy (public choice), the leader must decide what to do before. Any project that benefits the nation. Consider the alternative. The choice of the people will benefit much. The distribution of income, or income groups or clusters. Thus, the decision risk. Or under such uncertainties. Currently, the risk of conflict among individuals in a society that has a different view. How to mix a variety of needs. And political conditions are stable. A peep Or create public fear. Or foreigners to invest. The cost of investing in other countries. The political leaders must be aware of the national resources. And preserve the global environment at the same time, government leaders must แkga problems in normal daily operations. If no problems then. Government leaders as they dry. Like withered trees that fall or are smooth, with no barriers at all. It will not alert the government to solve the problem. The idea of ​​using intelligence to solve the problem of the nation. That is, people in need of strategic cooperation in solving the problem from the outside. Rather than internal competition. A collective rather than private, to economic prosperity. And flexibility in strategic competitive advantage (competitive advantage) but the law is too rigid and lacks flexibility in the business, it is not flexible. In the country there is no fixed formula. The leaders managed well, sometimes it is not expected to suffer. And leaders, but contrary to the public or its neighboring countries, making it the country's economic damage. But only the elite benefit from the spending to ensure stability. However, the lack of security. The country was not stable enough. So the government must look at the problem is an opportunity for the nation. It will feel awkward or embarrassed about their problems, but to think. "Steel that pass up the hottest must be strong steel. The country need strong leadership that beset the monsoon, "the problem may have an impact on people, but also create opportunities for growth. Such as increasing wages, which should rise to  300 baht is expensive. The government reduced income tax of 7%, it allows businesses to have the opportunity to work challenging. Capitalists, wealthy investors happy by sharing with society. Or return to society. The venture business is becoming a lucrative monopoly in the same group and with governments that sponsor them. Neglected social problems. And the cost to the government to be healing. Capitalists and business needs to turn to professional management. (Professional management) is not a success, wealth, or oppression of others to expand their wealth. But the richness of talent and intelligence. The people we care for the quality of life. Creating wealth is not a challenge to the soul of capitalism, not good business to turn the business life of the product with quality service. Quality of products and services. The society is in a much more professional. And a major force in developing countries. And successor (succession planning) to take care of business ventures in the future. The entrepreneurs of the creative production. Or enhance the quality of good management. The business venture will combine the anti-corruption The government may promote the services that businesses need a priority system. Then as a welfare center for the ฏia work. The rest have been less fortunate than the people. Which is better than the old capitalist system, businesses need to pay under the table to the politicians. Or political parties which do not have the income distribution. The concentration of income or a lucrative return of politicians only. In addition, operators should look, there's always something better to follow the wisdom of the products or services. The Thai government should promote further progress towards universal It will produce a society. But the education system, students memorize and parrot bird hill myna Not trained to use the idea or design ideas for people in developed countries. So any problems. The operators must always be seen as a solution. But not impassable. Because of the stalemate that would indicate a negative outlook. But it should be seen as positive. In this world no one is happy. And wealth without hard work there. If the wealthiest and most Okgkin without hard work, it will become a human being in terms of honor or dignity of the human being that is beneficial to the nation. This means that not as a parasite. The people on the earth that benefits will be Japan, and without selfishness. It becomes an ideal society where people of different national social good wishes. In addition, if the trader is not caught up with the old traditional methods can not produce new approaches to old social conditions and needs. And sometimes to resist new approaches, which could prove good or bad. Society should provide an opportunity to try new things, especially the children invent new things, and the government to invest, it is believed that the nation will consist of creative thinking. To support the creation of national economic growth would certainly be blessed as a distinct
      Thus, the operator The party leaders do not think the old old. When we find something new to resist change (resistante to change) becomes outdated. The fall in the future. The future of a visionary (visionary) in the foreseeable, generous, eager to Suo. New capabilities include sub closer look, intolerance, behave badly. Can not lead a country successfully. It is a debate I'll be a success, but not for the value to society.

bureaucratic polity in thailand

Democracy in civil, military, police In Thailand, which now has become a political analysis that is not listed. And the use of the drug upon the power of his left kidney. (Bureaucratic polity) in which the number of officers, soldiers. And police officers it has a lot of love, even though the Democratic party is the Conservative government. And tricks to the world in the era of globalization, because the system used to run the government. But a few officials to travel abroad to work with the people he works with advanced kidney. Especially in developed countries. Most of the work is often associated with activities or work in ministries, bureaus, departments of the habit of command of the adults in the government. The official ceremony, there is a nobility in the system, which has changed very little. Government officials also made a lot of the old system, and rarely changed. In the government were to change to the Governor and CEO. Which requires the Governor to the market (market model) is called. "Entrepreneur government" to the Governor who is a merchant. Or you can do to grow the economy in each province. And the distribution of income for poor people to upgrade to a better economy. But when the invitation of foreign masters such as Michael Port Chester, and Tom Peters is the guru of the world's No. 1 and No. 3 workshops to educate the CEO said. It turns out that the Governor could not get used to the old nobility, the government can not meet in the knowledge that is useful. The governor noted that the participants have been asleep, and was eager to get their medical knowledge. The ordinary government used to work at the command of the central Decided it was fear that Solaris would be a mistake. So the governor has not appreciated the risk. But the security in place over Thus causing anti-government forces in that period. If the governor does not work, it will be modified. The change in the government may change too quickly. And officials are also behind the increased flow resistance is not accustomed to the new ideas that happen, but what the government is also expected to receive government benefits or services to the public good. The military government with a democratic spirit quite a bit. The depth of the democratic. The United Way of Chii are located within the departments of the military. And never had a public life. Activities are often associated with the command. Must be in the discipline. I will get to know the real world. And livelihoods of people in general. But today there was a lot of interesting stories about the country. And democracy as the general public. The person appointed by the government to those who are non-democratic regime. The officer noted that the position of Maa do not focus on the power of the people. Or the right of the people. The military has not bound to the public or the sufferings of the people to make sense of a military career, he has been dropped. And often have a different career lines. The officers are public servants under a democratic regime, it is minimal. There was only the second level and down, and the spirit of democracy can not be fully expressed. But the embarrassment and frustration with the military who does not love democracy. But the military has been very active. And that the military does not help the country better. To make the situation worse. And wherever there is a limit when the coup, the country will note that they often fall down almost every time. It was not right with the country. And when it comes to political positions, it usually requires a high-security budget. The money to develop the nation'm connected to the economic well-being of the people and damage to the military that is trying to do well. But they were unsuccessful. The country has been more controversial. The military should accept that their role as public land. It should serve as a hedge of the nation would be better. Essential in democracy and military genius. Is required to send military officers to democratic political, and military role to protect the democracy and the public. It is an honorable soldier. And the trust of the people of the country. The military must be careful not to become tools of political groups. Or political parties. Even the authority of the above, it must be analyzed to determine the progress of democracy than any other country. The military and the generals of Indonesia has announced that he would be Prime Minister echoes the best of the country without corruption. And they do it well. It is acceptable to the people. The police or military officials are understood to be the most And live with a host of people understand the problems of the people. The police work closely with local people every day. The intimate life of the people know what is right. The police officers who love democracy as much as the country's military government should promote awareness of the spirit of democracy is not the aim but the quest for power system, outside the rules. The crisis in the country today is modern today.

The law should not create problems of social cracking

Current problems of democratic governance that Thai laws are often focuses too much. But the law is not consistent or the Thai people in different organizations, which sometimes caused the coup. The reliability of the fair is also a question of the whole society to be depicted as follows.
      1. The Constitution of 2550, the process turns out that the coup. Tai Sin and the legal community is often a double standard. This means that one party to the offense and the damage to the country when the coup appeared to have been tipped to delay the case. The judge deviated from the facts in the open dialog with a group. Or without any fault, while another case was a coup to have the case fast. And maintained by the investigation or progress. Causing suspicion that happen.
     2. The independent body appointed by the coup. Tend not to promote democratic. Such a fuss in detailed legislation. Haehtu party can break easily. The party, the User accepts the results of the election of the people who have real power. But who was appointed by the coup did not come from the election of the people. Or represent real people. Makes people feel they have the power to appoint. Sometimes it is done with the survival of the profession rather than because of its democratic ideals. Makes any decision is inconsistent with the needs of the people. And that the organization is small, it would have interfered with the decision to replace it easily.
    3. Some scholars have accepted the coup. Which did not have a heart to serve the people by a democratic regime. Critics tend to attack a political party that was more than a coup. The criticism that the coup had damaged the country. The scholars who use these may benefit from the coup in the appointment to the position of the different approach to power does not come from the election did not see the importance of the election of the people.
    4. The political popularity of the coup. Or use the non-conventional, non-democratic way. Attempts to overthrow the rival political brew. Based on a wizard that are the same. Or alliance. Thailand's democracy is a democracy dominated by a group of civil servants. The scholars who do not respect democracy. And become oblivious to the interests and people. It is because of the Thai education system over the past 30-40 years has shaped the ideology to serve the public. As a result, many scholars have placed their academic nobility. Rather than to the public, scholars and other scholars who are well educated. But life does not come into contact with poor people. The conscious mind is not linked to the problem of the poor. Or the grass roots.
    5. And that government intervention in all areas. It also does not alert to the problems of the country in the military should not be accepted. The coup was successful, it will be done when it's wise to reward civil servants, academics and users. The benefits are many different ways. And sometimes it wears several hats. The government can not act on that. A professional civil servants. Causing a host system will help each other rather than taking into account the fact And some scholars are not exposed to real life, it might believe the rumors. I never played the earlier qualification. So his lack of qualification, the most profitable (pragmatism).
    6. That the public is divided in two groups that have a conflict of interest. And neutral groups. The group, based on democracy, political authority over the people. The political advantage to a certain extent. It's not deep and democratic. But I do not like to judge. If you decide that a political party that does not work, it does not pay attention to it like it is. As the popularity of the party without looking at the principle. The people in the eye is just like a party, it is considered good. Lack of use of property. And a society based on fact. The curtains were still. And benefits that occur as a misty curtain blinds. If it turns out that his future may be affected. To understand the power of the majority of the country. As if one party is inclined or not Japan, justice will be seen not as an eye blink, pineapple. It has the advantage that the public awareness. And political participation. And help determine what's wrong better society.
     This is a political philosophy that is good, beauty, and the fact that I have a good guy but only the good word. Or think it's good. But the truth is not. And there is no beauty in the heart of democracy, it is not good. For those who are well, beauty. However, it is create image only. But the reality is a charlatan and fraud, it catches. It is not good. So it must have three elements, it will be good only for themselves. But not enough to be of great help to the public. Because of the great liberal democratic, it is a great pleasure, the way in the betterment of the people. And security of society as well. It will be good. Because of the effect of the work only to be reliable. If a person has the power.

The law should not create problems of social turbulence

Current problems of democratic governance that Thai laws are often focuses too much. But the law is not consistent or the Thai people in different organizations, which sometimes caused the coup. The reliability of the fair is also a question of the whole society to be depicted as follows.
      1. The Constitution of 2550, the process turns out that the coup. Desicion for rule and the legal community is often a double standard. This means that one party to the offense and the damage to the country when the coup appeared to have been tipped to delay the case. In the case the other party to the lawsuit, which was a coup. And maintained by the investigation or progress. Causing suspicion that happen.
     2. The independent body appointed by the coup. Tend not to promote democratic. Such a fuss in detailed legislation. Haehtu party can break easily. The party, the User accepts the results of the election of the people who have real power. But who was appointed by the coup did not come from the election of the people. Or represent real people. Makes people feel they have the power to appoint. Sometimes it is done with the survival of the profession rather than because of its democratic ideals. Makes any decision is inconsistent with the needs of the people. And that the organization is small, it would have interfered with the decision to replace it easily.
    3. Some scholars have accepted the coup. Which did not have a heart to serve the people by a democratic regime. Critics tend to attack a political party that was more than a coup. The criticism that the coup had damaged the country. The scholars who use these may benefit from the coup in the appointment to the position of the different approach to power does not come from the election did not see the importance of the election of the people.
    4. The political popularity of the coup. Or use the non-conventional, non-democratic way. Attempts to overthrow the rival political brew. Based on a wizard that are the same. Or alliance. Thailand's democracy is a democracy dominated by a group of civil servants. The scholars who do not respect democracy. And become oblivious to the interests and people. It is because of the Thai education system over the past 30-40 years has shaped the ideology to serve the public. As a result, many scholars have placed their academic nobility. Rather than to the public, scholars and other scholars who are well educated. But life does not come into contact with poor people. The conscious mind is not linked to the problem of the poor. Or the grass roots.
    5. And that government intervention in all areas. It also does not alert to the problems of the country in the military should not be accepted. The coup was successful, it will be done when it's wise to reward civil servants, academics and users. The benefits are many different ways. And sometimes it wears several hats. The government can not act on that. A professional civil servants. Causing a host system will help each other rather than taking into account the fact And some scholars are not exposed to real life, it might believe the rumors. I never played the earlier qualification. So his lack of qualification, the most profitable (pragmatism).
    6. That the public is divided in two groups that have a conflict of interest. And neutral groups. The group, based on democracy, political authority over the people. The political advantage to a certain extent. It's not deep and democratic. But I do not like to judge. If you decide that a political party that does not work, it does not pay attention to it like it is. As the popularity of the party without looking at the principle. The people in the eye is just like a party, it is considered good. Lack of use of property. And a society based on fact. The curtains were still. And benefits that occur as a misty curtain blinds. If it turns out that his future may be affected. To understand the power of the majority of the country. As if one party is inclined or not Japan, justice will be seen not as an eye blink, pineapple. It has the advantage that the public awareness. And political participation. And help determine what's wrong better society.
     This is a political philosophy that is good, beauty, and the fact that I have a car but only the good word. Or think it's good. But the truth is not. And there is no beauty in the heart of democracy, it is not good. For those who are well, beauty. However, it is plastered face. But the reality is a charlatan and fraud, it catches. It is not good. So it must have three elements, it will be good only for themselves. But not enough to be of great help to the public. Because of the great liberal democratic, it is a great pleasure, the way in the betterment of the people. And security of society as well. It will be good. Because of the effect of the work only to be reliable. If a person has authority to be invalid would be difficult to maintain good performance, which is proven by many countries.

TV should create a variety of different media by changing the face of a new era.

The media, especially television media, radio, and newspapers. Should standardize the presentation of media neutrality. And insist on the fact that most The interview should be interviewed in the area with many professional groups. The facts in the realm of expression that are not extensive. Or arrange for a debate.There is very little science. But the news out there, but natural disasters, floods, etc., which is required to publish. But news of the world's research. Or new knowledge. Or science, as well as new information is still being published. We can not see the vision of the world. The integrated approach of development in the rice. The media suggestions to the government. Because the media is the reality in society. And career progress than others, but the media should have the media, academics and research analysts to help with. To the society. The invention involves the creation of various inventions. Or encourage higher education institutions have to change the direction the country is still not done. Or did not develop. Presentation of the solution. The analysis of the problem about the lack of efficiency in the university system. Teaching and learning. Or attention to work in the university system to stimulate And promote incentives for teachers, students recognized that the Thai society is very often invited to speak as a guest speaker was invited to have a new look or the younger generation. The expression or opinion. The media should not have a political bias, such as the media. One political party or any political leaning. But it should be expressed in a creative way to help a country develop national video. But, do not promote the image of the person who caused the chaos, confusion in the city, unless you want to present the truth. Media should be white media. A medium gray. The media makes me feel that it is not neutral. And do not bring the facts to speak. Or that too many news sources. So would the media have presented a neutral, factual scientific terms, the legitimacy of the country. And fairness. The media focused on the public sector. Personnel working on the packaging material must be modern, up and trick the bad things that in all cases. It is a medium quality. And dominate the public mind.

Thailand's Prime Minister welcomed the first woman in history.

       Counting of votes in elections on July 3, 2554, which it turns out that the Thai people to vote as one. And the right to form a government. This allows you to look for opportunities to become the first female Prime Minister of Thailand. It is a new dimension of the leaders are women. It's exciting. The room with the Thais, most of the opportunity. So what's new government has the vision to confront the problem, which will be summarized as follows.
         1. Preparing to form a government by sending over major political parties joined the government.
         2. The strategy was discussed with the public policy in a commitment to the public.
         3. The approach to reconciliation is the first to end the conflicts, the Thai people. Rehabilitation and mental conditions. The economy is also a problem first.
         4. Strive with all the points.
         5. To improve the management of the standard management of public sector modernization.
         6. Promote laws that provide justice to all parties, equality, freedom of the people, the chances of having a better life.
         7. Helping the poor to switch to Chึi the distribution of income, the opportunity to revive the Thai people Diึg up.

The national and political persecution.

       Bullying. The fall of political power. Represents a political ethics. If it's playing football if there were political opponents pretend like the slides. People will see that the picture is not beautiful. I have the whistle. The director of football to be seen by the viewer. But sometimes, the invisible or pretend to not see the page of a cheering Raaa But people see that people should be punished libel. Because it is not the end of political persecution. As a result, he stumbling falls. Not develop to the next. Because the political parties as we find fault Which imply that the failure of the democratic game. Suggests that the country is not democratic. That democracy is the length. I do not like his lyrics. All segments of society should join hands to talk. Do not use dirty. I know this because I know in the future. I would not want people who do not like how messy democracy. Potential energy on people who are not satisfied with this action. The greater truth. And their co-operation with the power of democracy. Up to that time would not be changed. But the desire to have a smooth transition. Thai people do not want to destroy each other as fellow human beings in the world. Should be given justice, equality, about forgiveness. A vengeful rage. Or fear that their own actions. Do not panic, but should be used against political opponents based on the center line. Because this may cause a single drop of honey. If the people lose. Those orders. Or the public, it would be a terrible sin. If that time comes I will definitely feel pain. So the wise man will not do that. It was the creation of the country. A country that badly damaged. For other countries see Iran as a perfect his appeal. We recommend using no rights because we are Thai people alike. No country will love the Thai people of Thailand. If we split. I like the cracked earth. Crops do not grow. It should be used to shoveling. To achieve productivity And the country's prosperity as well.

Poor countries. Is the lifeblood of government. And navigate the political elite.

      Think of the budget were adopted to govern the country as ministries, agencies, government departments or positions. It all depends on your budget. This shows that the officials. And the political use of tax money are all of the people. Although the private sector would be taxed more, it's true. But it is a lucrative business from the poor workers. Military officers, civilians and politicians would take the tax from the public. Therefore, because the poor people or people of the country. Does not respect the voice of the people. Based on the decision of some groups, which was only a few people to take power instead. Millions of people. Considering it is not appropriate and not very fair. Such as the overthrow of power by the dissolution of political parties. It was commissioned by a group of military officers listen to the voice of the people are ultimately to be isolated from society. And it is undesirable for society. If no adjustment in recognition that the people who are obliged to have. Political role. Or officials. The Thai people are not getting nasty. It is a matter of honor, dignity. We should not forget the favor. No matter what color shirt to the Thai people as well. We also found that the government recently passed away, it can not perform as well if we do not respect the rights of the people, but to listen to the voice on the right. That would be dangerous. So do not forget that we have a loyalty to the ascendancy We look to the public.

Thai democracy originate from above to grass-root

Democracy in Thailand occurred on June 24, 2475 by the Rat. Including civil, military, police Has made a revolutionary change of government from absolute monarchy. The current government has been active in the political elite by Dr. Pridi Banomyong and Gen. Chao army troops. The government has developed a group of the Rat but can not create a sustainable democracy, and on October 14, 2516 was a democratic political awareness by students, college students. The pro-democracy demonstrations. The change in the constitution more democratic one. The democracy movement was born in that era. A process of democratization of the middle class, mostly. But democracy is not changed by a majority of the country. Because there are still groups of people supporting the student, students, college students. To resist the power of the military preservation, illumination, and until the era of coups in 2535, there have been revolutionary. And the middle class up until the battle of democracy once again. And the draft constitution in 2540, the Constitution is broad public participation in the history. And today there was another group of pro-democracy forces. This is a grassroots call for a leader to help him. And rights, freedom, equality As well as middle class and nobility. Democratic approach to the current confusion. Because the middle class. The nobility did not accept the grassroots level. They perceive a low level of education. I do not mind the Democratic calendar. And that suggestive of the former leader was actually caused by people that in the absence of a truly democratic and grass-roots people are the ones who seemed most Because it is being exploited, no help or enhance their capacity to improve and want to rely on a dependable. And a leader who has the ability. It is not the issue of whether the public supports the former leader. Currently, public calendar, but it is more political. And political participation. And quality of life better. Because the current system using traditional methods and can not give people a better life. This is not the fault of the people who are struggling for a better life.