The law should not create problems of social turbulence

Current problems of democratic governance that Thai laws are often focuses too much. But the law is not consistent or the Thai people in different organizations, which sometimes caused the coup. The reliability of the fair is also a question of the whole society to be depicted as follows.
      1. The Constitution of 2550, the process turns out that the coup. Desicion for rule and the legal community is often a double standard. This means that one party to the offense and the damage to the country when the coup appeared to have been tipped to delay the case. In the case the other party to the lawsuit, which was a coup. And maintained by the investigation or progress. Causing suspicion that happen.
     2. The independent body appointed by the coup. Tend not to promote democratic. Such a fuss in detailed legislation. Haehtu party can break easily. The party, the User accepts the results of the election of the people who have real power. But who was appointed by the coup did not come from the election of the people. Or represent real people. Makes people feel they have the power to appoint. Sometimes it is done with the survival of the profession rather than because of its democratic ideals. Makes any decision is inconsistent with the needs of the people. And that the organization is small, it would have interfered with the decision to replace it easily.
    3. Some scholars have accepted the coup. Which did not have a heart to serve the people by a democratic regime. Critics tend to attack a political party that was more than a coup. The criticism that the coup had damaged the country. The scholars who use these may benefit from the coup in the appointment to the position of the different approach to power does not come from the election did not see the importance of the election of the people.
    4. The political popularity of the coup. Or use the non-conventional, non-democratic way. Attempts to overthrow the rival political brew. Based on a wizard that are the same. Or alliance. Thailand's democracy is a democracy dominated by a group of civil servants. The scholars who do not respect democracy. And become oblivious to the interests and people. It is because of the Thai education system over the past 30-40 years has shaped the ideology to serve the public. As a result, many scholars have placed their academic nobility. Rather than to the public, scholars and other scholars who are well educated. But life does not come into contact with poor people. The conscious mind is not linked to the problem of the poor. Or the grass roots.
    5. And that government intervention in all areas. It also does not alert to the problems of the country in the military should not be accepted. The coup was successful, it will be done when it's wise to reward civil servants, academics and users. The benefits are many different ways. And sometimes it wears several hats. The government can not act on that. A professional civil servants. Causing a host system will help each other rather than taking into account the fact And some scholars are not exposed to real life, it might believe the rumors. I never played the earlier qualification. So his lack of qualification, the most profitable (pragmatism).
    6. That the public is divided in two groups that have a conflict of interest. And neutral groups. The group, based on democracy, political authority over the people. The political advantage to a certain extent. It's not deep and democratic. But I do not like to judge. If you decide that a political party that does not work, it does not pay attention to it like it is. As the popularity of the party without looking at the principle. The people in the eye is just like a party, it is considered good. Lack of use of property. And a society based on fact. The curtains were still. And benefits that occur as a misty curtain blinds. If it turns out that his future may be affected. To understand the power of the majority of the country. As if one party is inclined or not Japan, justice will be seen not as an eye blink, pineapple. It has the advantage that the public awareness. And political participation. And help determine what's wrong better society.
     This is a political philosophy that is good, beauty, and the fact that I have a car but only the good word. Or think it's good. But the truth is not. And there is no beauty in the heart of democracy, it is not good. For those who are well, beauty. However, it is plastered face. But the reality is a charlatan and fraud, it catches. It is not good. So it must have three elements, it will be good only for themselves. But not enough to be of great help to the public. Because of the great liberal democratic, it is a great pleasure, the way in the betterment of the people. And security of society as well. It will be good. Because of the effect of the work only to be reliable. If a person has authority to be invalid would be difficult to maintain good performance, which is proven by many countries.